This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Macklin, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The moral autonomy of human resource managers

Charles Sturt University - Albury Wodonga, Australia, rmacklin{at}csu.edu.au

Moral autonomy is a concept drawn from moral philosophy that can help build an understanding of the ethical dimension of human resource (HR) managers’ roles. In this article I suggest that the concept be used to avoid simplistically viewing HR managers as either irrelevant to the ethics of human resource management (HRM) or capable of guaranteeing moral HR practices. Drawing on the findings of a qualitative study I argue that HR managers face ‘relative’ moral autonomy. While their capacity to ensure decency in the management of human recourses is inevitably constrained, we must not assume away the possibility that they can be important moral actors who play a role in, and have a responsibility for, determining how ethical HRM is in any organization. Moreover, this capacity should be fostered by the HR profession and academic commentators given the growing decollectivization and decentralization of employment relations in Australia.

Key Words: HR managers • moral autonomy • relative autonomy

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?