This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Head, L. Articles by Harcourt, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Direct and Indirect Costs of Work Injuries and Diseases in New Zealand

Victoria University, New Zealand

Mark Harcourt

Victoria University, New Zealand

Justifications for either increasing or decreasing public and private expenditure on occupational health and safety are increasingly focused on the costs of work injuries and diseases and their prevention, especially given current fiscal restraint and business competitiveness. This study estimates the indirect/non insurance costs of work injuries and diseases in New Zealand and compares them to the direct/insurance costs to assess the seriousness of work injuries and diseases in financial terms. Indirect costs are classified as either employer, employee, or community costs and based primarily on information provided by the ACC and the Departments of Labour and Social Welfare. The indirect to direct cost ratio is 1:2.9, for estimated indirect costs of $314 696 000 and direct costs of $912 696 000. This low ratio suggests that greater efforts at hazard prevention would yield few savings beyond any reduction in insurance costs. However, better estimates for community and employee costs, in particular, which are underestimated or omitted in this study, would likely lead to a very different conclusion.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?