This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nankervis, A. R. Articles by Leece, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Performance Appraisal: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back?

University of Western Sydney, Nepean

Priscilla Leece

University of Western Sydney, Nepean

This article reports the findings of a recent study of performance appraisal systems in Australian industry, updating earlier research data in view of con temporary organizational and industrial relations changes. Research results suggest that, while substantial forward steps have been made, organizations still have some way to go in their pursuit of 'best practice' appraisal schemes. Performance appraisal (PA) is still a popular HRM tool, with increased employee coverage and an emphasis on Management by Objectives. There is some evidence that organizations are more closely customizing their PA systems, sometimes in conjunction with quality programs, to meet their specific HR objectives. Conversely, the objectives of many PA systems remain short- term rather than strategic, and there appears to be a decline in the use of formal PA feedback mechanisms.

Overall, this survey suggests a focus on performance evaluation rather than training and development, and increasingly a 'hard' HRM perspective capi talizing on current industrial relations changes.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?