Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sloan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 32, No. 2, 13-26 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/103841119403200203

A Memorable Year

A Review of Australian Industrial Relations in 1993

Judith Sloan

National Institute of Labour Studies, Adelaide

This article reviews the major Australian industrial relations developments that occurred in 1993. Federal industrial relations developments were domi nated by the passing of the Industrial Relations Reform Act, a pro-union piece of legislation which emphasizes bargaining, while at the same time retaining and codifying the award system. Important changes include: an institution alized right to strike, dilution of secondary boycott provisions and the estab lishment of a new Industrial Relations Court. Simultaneously, changes to state industrial relations laws were enacted and/or took effect in 1993. The Tas manian and Western Australian opting-out versions of reform are such that their industrial relations jurisdictions are likely to remain intact. Parallel experiments (federal and state) now co-exist, both of which place primacy on bargaining. The federal system all but guarantees a role for unions in the bargaining process, whereas these states' systems allow for union involvement, but do not guarantee it. It will be fascinating to make comparative assessments of the outcomes of the two models in the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?