Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Other

Total Quality Management and Human Resource Management: Comparisons and Contrasts

Gill Palmer

University of Wollongong

Ian Saunders

Queensland University of Technology

Total Quality Management (TQM) is an important aspect of current management thought. However, the human resource management implications of TQM have still to be subjected to detailed analysis and investigation. This article outlines the basic elements of TQM and compares these with previous movements for managerial reform. The comparison highlights the similarities and differences with earlier schools of thought and the history demonstrates the need to distinguish between espoused and implemented tbeories

The implications of TQM for employment relations have not been adequately thought through, but TQM can be distinguished from earlier schools of management thought by its orientation to systems instead of persons. To illustrate this difference, the TQM approach is compared with the philosophy of Management by Objectives Because MBO has a focus on individual, rather than system performance, it can have harmful and demotivating consequences. It is noted that the original philosophy of MBO did not intend to encourage short-term orientations limited to financial returns. However, MBO has failed by becoming a recipe, in which the most visible features become the end rather than the means. TQM can avoid the dangers of demotivating people, but care will be needed to ensure that TQM does not also became a recipe, in which certain visible techniques replace the substance of customer focus, teamwork and data-based decision-making.

Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 30, No. 2, 67-78 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/103841119203000210


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
B. Kane
Downsizing, TQM, Re-engineering, Learning Organizations and HRM Strategy
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, January 1, 2000; 38(1): 26 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
A. Brown
Quality Management: Issues for Human Resource Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, March 1, 1996; 33(3): 117 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
L.V. Entrekin and C.A.L. Pearson
A Comparison of Values Espoused by Quality and Other Managers
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, March 1, 1996; 33(3): 130 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]