Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirkbride, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Shae Wan Chaw,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 27, No. 1, 7-19 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/103841118902700103

The Transferability of Management Training and Development: The Case of Hong Kong

Paul S. Kirkbride

Department of business and Management, at City Polytechnic of Hong Kong

Sara F.Y. Tang

Department of business and Management, at City Polytechnic of Hong Kong

Shae Wan Chaw

Department of Applied Social Studies at Hong Kong Polytechnic

The purpose of this paper is to critically review the role of culture as a potential barrier to the transferability of management training and development. The paper therefore seeks to summarise the relevant literature and, in doing so, to transcend the dichotomy of the 'culture-free' and 'culture-determinist' positions and the presentation of culture as a simple and undifferentiated 'barrier.' From our literature review and train ing experience in this area we develop a model of three different levels ofcul tural effect: the level of training/learning style, the level of values, and the level of cognition. The paper then attempts to illustrate the operation of these levels as barriers to the successful implementation of a training and development intervention in Hong Kong. Finally, an agenda for future research on this im portant topic for trainers in South East Asia is suggested.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?