Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 17, No. 2, 17-23 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/103841117901700202

The Criteria. Method of Objective Performance Appraisal

Amira Galin

The use of performance appraisal schemes continues to grow. A survey carried out in the mid 60s within The Private enterprise in Australia indicated that one third of all employees surveyed participated in some form of appraisal scheme. Surveys conducted in the mid 70s revealed that at least 41 per cent of the organizations were using appraisal methods. 2 As the application of performance appraisal becomes increasingly widespread, the search for greater objectivity in performance appraisal has been intensified., However, no conceptual framework has been developed to enable a more systematic analysis of the existing methods as well as for design ing new ones.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?